diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'blog/2020-10-12-mediocrity.org')
-rw-r--r-- | blog/2020-10-12-mediocrity.org | 111 |
1 files changed, 111 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/blog/2020-10-12-mediocrity.org b/blog/2020-10-12-mediocrity.org new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ce79f3b --- /dev/null +++ b/blog/2020-10-12-mediocrity.org @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ +#+date: 2020-10-12 +#+title: On the Pursuit of Mediocrity + +* Perfect is the Enemy of Good + +As the saying goes, "the best is the enemy of the good." As we strive for +perfection, we often fail to realize the implications of such an undertaking. +Attempting to reach perfection is often unrealistic. Even worse, it can get in +the way of achieving a good outcome. In certain situations, we try so hard to +achieve the ideal solution that we have burned the bridges that would have +allowed us to reach a lesser yet still superb solution. + +Philosophers throughout history have inspected this plight from many viewpoints. +Greek mythology speaks of the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_mean_(philosophy)][golden mean]], which uses the story of Icarus to +illustrate that sometimes "the middle course" is the best solution. In this +story, Daedalus, a famous artist of his time, built feathered wings for himself +and his son so that they might escape the clutches of King Minos. Daedalus warns +his beloved son whom he loved so much to "fly the middle course", between the +sea spray and the sun's heat. Icarus did not heed his father; he flew up and up +until the sun melted the wax off his wings. For not heeding the middle course, +he fell into the sea and drowned. + +More recently, management scholars have explored the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle][Pareto principle]] and found +that as we increase the frequency of something, or strive to perform actions to +achieve some form of perfection, we run into [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diminishing_returns][diminishing returns]]. + +Even further, Harold Demsetz is noted as coining the term [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nirvana_fallacy][the Nirvana fallacy]] in +1969, which shows the fallacy of comparing actual things with unrealistic, +idealized alternatives. This is another trap that we may fall into, where we are +constantly thinking of the ultimate solutions to problems, when something more +realistic needs to be considered. + +Over and over throughout history, we've found that perfection is often +unrealistic and unachievable. However, we push ourselves and our peers to "give +100%" or "go the extra mile," while it may be that the better course is to give +a valuable level of effort while considering the effects of further effort on +the outcome. Working harder does not always help us achieve loftier goals. + +This has presented itself to me most recently during my time studying at my +university. I was anxious and feeling the stresses of my courses, career, and +personal life for quite a while, which was greatly affecting how well I was +doing at school and my level of effort at work. One day, I happened to be +talking to my father when he said something simple that hit home: + +#+BEGIN_QUOTE +All you can do is show up and do your best. +Worrying about the outcomes won't affect the outcome itself. +#+END_QUOTE + +The thought was extremely straightforward and uncomplicated, yet it was +something that I had lost sight of during my stress-filled years at school. Ever +since then, I've found myself pausing and remembering that quote every time I +get anxious or stressed. It helps to stop and think "Can I do anything to affect +the outcome, or am I simply worrying over something I can't change?" + +* When Mediocrity Isn't Enough + +One problem with the philosophies presented in this post is that they are +implemented far too often in situations where mediocrity simply isn't adequate. +For example, let's take a look at digital user data, specifically +personally-identifiable information (PII). As a cybersecurity auditor in the +United States, I have found that most companies are concerned more with +compliance than any actual safeguards over the privacy or protection of user +data. Other than companies who have built their reputation on privacy and +security, most companies will use [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satisficing][satisficing]] as their primary decision-making +strategy around user data. + +#+BEGIN_QUOTE +Satisficing is a decision-making strategy or cognitive heuristic that entails +searching through the available alternatives until an acceptability threshold +is met. +#+END_QUOTE + +This means that each decision will be met with certain possible solutions until +one of the solutions meets their minimum acceptable standards. For companies +that deal with user data, the minimum-acceptable standards come from three +areas: + +1. Laws and regulations +2. Competitive pressure +3. Risk of monetary or reputation loss + +Working with project management or auditing, the primary concern here is the +risk of legal ramifications. Since the primary risk comes from laws and +regulations, companies will require that any project that involves user data +must follow all the rules of those laws so that the company can protect itself +from fines or other penalties. + +Following this, companies will consider best practices in order to place itself +in a competitive position (e.g. Google vs. Apple) and review any recent or +ongoing litigation against companies regarding user data. In a perfect company, +management would then consider the ethical responsibilities of their +organization and discuss their responsibilities over things like +personally-identifiable information. + +However, as we mentioned above, most companies follow the idea of satisficing, +which states that they have met the minimum acceptable standards and can now +move on to other decisions. Modern business culture in the United States +dictates that profits are the golden measure of how well a company or manager is +performing, so we often don't think about our responsibilities beyond these +basic standards. + +Not all situations demand excellence, but I believe that applying any philosophy +as a broad stroke across one's life can be a mistake. We must be able to think +critically about what we are doing as we do it and ask ourselves a few +questions. Have I done everything I can in this situation? Is mediocrity an +acceptable outcome, or should we strive for perfection, even if we can't attain +it? + +Taking a few moments to think critically throughout our day, as we make +decisions, can have a tremendous effect on the outcomes we create. |