aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/content/blog/2023-08-18-agile-auditing.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'content/blog/2023-08-18-agile-auditing.md')
-rw-r--r--content/blog/2023-08-18-agile-auditing.md158
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 158 deletions
diff --git a/content/blog/2023-08-18-agile-auditing.md b/content/blog/2023-08-18-agile-auditing.md
deleted file mode 100644
index f813596..0000000
--- a/content/blog/2023-08-18-agile-auditing.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,158 +0,0 @@
-+++
-date = 2023-08-18
-title = "Agile Auditing: An Introduction"
-description = "A quick introduction to using the Agile methodology in an audit."
-+++
-
-## What is Agile Auditing?
-
-[Agile](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agile_software_development), the
-collaborative philosophy behind many software development methods, has
-been picking up steam as a beneficial tool to use in the external and
-internal auditing world.
-
-This blog post will walk through commonly used terms within Agile,
-Scrum, and Kanban in order to translate these terms and roles into
-audit-specific terms.
-
-Whether your team is in charge of a financial statement audit, an
-attestation (SOC 1, SOC 2, etc.), or a unique internal audit, the terms
-used throughout this post should still apply.
-
-## Agile
-
-To start, I'll take a look at Agile.
-
-> The Agile methodology is a project management approach that involves
-> breaking the project into phases and emphasizes continuous
-> collaboration and improvement. Teams follow a cycle of planning,
-> executing, and evaluating.
-
-While this approach may seem familiar to what audit teams have
-historically done, an audit team must make distinct changes in their
-mentality and how they approach and manage a project.
-
-### Agile Values
-
-The Agile Manifesto, written in 2001 at a summit in Utah, contain a set
-of four main values that comprise the Agile approach:
-
-1. Individuals and interactions over processes and tools.
-2. Working software over comprehensive documentation.
-3. Customer collaboration over contract negotiation.
-4. Responding to change over following a plan.
-
-Beyond the four values, [twelve
-principles](https://agilemanifesto.org/principles.html) were also
-written as part of the summit.
-
-In order to relate these values to an audit or attestation engagement,
-we need to shift the focus from software development to the main goal of
-an engagement: completing sufficient audit testing to address to
-relevant risks over the processes and controls at hand.
-
-Audit Examples:
-
-- Engagement teams must value the team members, client contacts, and
- their interactions over the historical processes and tools that have
- been used.
-- Engagement teams must value a final report that contains sufficient
- audit documentation over excessive documentation or scope creep.
-- Engagement teams must collaborate with the audit clients as much as
- feasible to ensure that both sides are constantly updated with
- current knowledge of the engagement's status and any potential
- findings, rather than waiting for pre-set meetings or the end of the
- engagement to communicate.
-- Engagement teams must be able to respond to change in an
- engagement's schedule, scope, or environment to ensure that the
- project is completed in a timely manner and that all relevant areas
- are tested.
- - In terms of an audit department's portfolio, they must be able
- to respond to changes in their company's or client's
- environment and be able to dynamically change their audit plan
- accordingly.
-
-## Scrum
-
-The above section discusses the high-level details of the Agile
-philosophy and how an audit team can potentially mold that mindset into
-the audit world, but how does a team implement these ideas?
-
-There are many methods that use an Agile mindset, but I prefer
-[Scrum](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrum_(software_development)).
-Scrum is a framework based on Agile that enables a team to work through
-a project through a series of roles, ceremonies, artifacts, and values.
-
-Let's dive into each of these individually.
-
-### Scrum Team
-
-A scrum project is only as good as the team running the project.
-Standard scrum teams are separated into three distinct areas:
-
-1. **Product Owner (Client Contact)**: The client contact is the audit
- equivalent of the product owner in Scrum. They are responsible for
- partnering with the engagement or audit team to ensure progress is
- being made, priorities are established, and clear guidance is given
- when questions or findings arise within each sprint.
-2. **Scrum Master (Engagement Lead)**: The engagement or audit team
- lead is responsible for coaching the team and the client contact on
- the scrum process, tracking team progress against plan, scheduling
- necessary resources, and helping remove obstacles.
-3. **Scrum Developers (Engagement Members)**: The engagement or audit
- team is the set of team members responsible for getting the work
- done. These team members will work on each task, report progress,
- resolve obstacles, and collaborate with other team members and the
- client contact to ensure goals are being met.
-
-### Scrum Ceremonies
-
-Scrum ceremonies are events that are performed on a regular basis.
-
-1. **Sprint Planning**: The team works together to plan the upcoming
- sprint goal and which user stories (tasks) will be added to the
- sprint to achieve that goal.
-2. **Sprint**: The time period, typically at least one week and no more
- than one month in length, where the team works on the stories and
- anything in the backlog.
-3. **Daily Scrum**: A very short meeting held each day, typically 15
- minutes, to quickly emphasize alignment on the sprint goal and plan
- the next 24 hours. Each team member may share what they did the day
- before, what they'll do today, and any obstacles to their work.
-4. **Sprint Review**: At the end of each sprint, the team will gather
- and discuss the progress, obstacles, and backlog from the previous
- sprint.
-5. **Sprint Retrospective**: More specific than the sprint review, the
- retrospective is meant to discuss what worked and what did not work
- during the sprint. This may be processes, tools, people, or even
- things related to the Scrum ceremonies.
-
-One additional ceremony that may be applicable is organizing the
-backlog. This is typically the responsibility of the engagement leader
-and is meant to prioritize and clarify what needs to be done to complete
-items in the backlog.
-
-### Artifacts
-
-While artifacts are generally not customizable in the audit world (i.e.,
-each control test must include some kind of working paper with evidence
-supporting the test results), I wanted to include some quick notes on
-associating scrum artifact terms with an audit.
-
-1. **Product Backlog**: This is the overall backlog of unfinished audit
- tasks from all prior sprints.
-2. **Sprint Backlog**: This is the backlog of unfinished audit tasks
- from one individual sprint.
-3. **Increment**: This is the output of each sprint - generally this is
- best thought of as any documentation prepared during the sprint,
- such as risk assessments, control working papers, deficiency
- analysis, etc.
-
-## Kanban
-
-Last but not least, Kanban is a methodology that relies on boards to
-categorize work into distinct, descriptive categories that allow an
-agile or scrum team to effectively plan the work of a sprint or project.
-
-See Atlassian's [Kanban](https://www.atlassian.com/agile/kanban) page
-for more information.